Press & Media Kit
Everything journalists need to cover Texas family court reform. Download-ready assets, verified facts, and interview contacts.
Last updated: August 26, 2026
Media Contact
There's more to this story.
Secure, encrypted contact for sensitive information.
Jump to Section
💬 The Story in One Line
For Headlines & Social
"Texas law allows attorneys to 'serve' custody papers to wrong addresses with zero verification—parents lose their children without ever knowing there was a court case."
📊 Quick Facts
The Problem at a Glance
Drawn from public court records and legal research. Case-study figures describe what the docket shows; whether service was proper is before the court and has not been decided.
📥 For Reporters
We will send you the filings directly. Email media@safesapcrtx.org and ask for any document referenced on this site, and you will get it. That is the fastest route to verifying anything here.
You can also pull the record yourself from the Harris County District Clerk — but note that as of August 2026 the clerk requires a free registered account to view Civil and Family case records, which it did not previously. The cause numbers are published on this page and on the case study so you can check every date against the docket.
Quick Facts
Overview of the problem, key statistics, and proposed solutions. All the essential information at a glance.
View FactsCase Study Timeline
Detailed chronology from public Harris County court records showing exactly how fraud occurred.
View Case StudyLegal Background
Texas Rule 239a analysis, constitutional issues, and case law references.
View AnalysisPress Release
Official press release with full email text as sent to media and advocates.
View Release💬 Key Talking Points
For Interviews & Articles
- The Loophole Texas Rule 239a allows attorneys to certify a respondent's "last known address" without any verification requirement. No proof. No documentation. Just their word. This enables service of process to wrong addresses, resulting in default judgments against people who never received notice.
- Constitutional Violation When parents don't receive notice of custody proceedings, they lose their fundamental constitutional right to be heard before their parental rights are modified. Children are separated from loving parents through paperwork fraud, not evidence.
- No Remedy, No Accountability The only current remedy is a Bill of Review—an expensive, time-consuming legal proceeding that most affected parents cannot afford. Meanwhile, there's zero penalty for attorneys who file false certificates.
- The Solution Exists The SAFE SAPCR Act would require mandatory constable service, attorney due diligence certification with documentation, criminal penalties for fraud, and expedited remedies for victims.
- Bipartisan Issue This isn't partisan. Parents of all backgrounds, political affiliations, and demographics are affected. Everyone agrees that due process and parental rights are fundamental.
📅 Case Timeline (Public Record)
How a Default Custody Judgment Happens Without Notice
Cause No. 202417675, 311th District Court, Harris County. Docket events are taken from the Harris County District Clerk record. Items drawn from the pleadings are labelled as such — those are allegations the court has not ruled on.
💬 Quotable Quotes
Quotes for attribution
This press kit previously offered four quotes here “available for attribution”. They were illustrative copy, not statements anyone made, and three of them described a filing as fraudulent — a question that is before the court in Cause No. 202592876 and has not been decided. They have been removed rather than reworded, because a quote a reporter can print has to be one somebody actually said.
For an on-the-record quote, or an interview with the respondent parent in Cause No. 202417675, contact media@safesapcrtx.org.
📰 Story Angles
The 239a Loophole
How Texas family law attorneys exploit a procedural gap to obtain custody orders against parents who never knew they were sued.
Fighting to Come Home
Parents spending years and life savings to overturn fraudulent default judgments and reunite with their children.
The SAFE SAPCR Act
Proposed legislation would reform service requirements and add accountability. Who supports it? Who opposes it? Why?
Due Process in Family Court
Constitutional implications of allowing custody modifications without verified notice. Expert analysis from family law scholars.
How Other States Do It
Texas vs. other states: comparing service of process requirements in custody cases. Who does it better?
Fixing the System
Concrete reforms that would prevent fraud while keeping courts accessible. Technology, process, and accountability changes.
🎨 Logo & Brand Assets
SAFE SAPCR Texas Logo
Please use without modification. Maintain clear space around the logo equal to the height of the "S" in SAFE.
Light background
Dark background
#1e3a5f
#e85d04
#f59e0b
📄 About SAFE SAPCR Texas
Boilerplate (Copy-Ready)
SAFE SAPCR Texas (Service Accountability and Fraud Elimination for Suits Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship) is a Texas legal information project on service of process and default judgments in family court. It was built and is maintained by Scott Allen Willis, a pro se litigant in Harris County who lost conservatorship through a default judgment entered without notice. It advocates for legislative changes that would require verified service, attorney accountability, and expedited remedies. All resources are free.
Its aim is that no parent loses custody of their children through paperwork fraud. SAFE SAPCR Texas is not a law firm and not a registered entity, and does not provide legal advice or representation.
Website: safesapcrtx.org | Email: info@safesapcrtx.org | Media: media@safesapcrtx.org